They did lots of autopsies in the 1500’s, 1600’s, 1700’s and 1800’s, and yet Alzheimer’s was not identified until 1906, even though it is very easy to see an Alzheimer’s brain because it is 25% smaller than a normal brain as noted by Boyd Haley, PhD, the world’s leading expert on mercury toxicity.

Why would this be?

They started putting mercury fillings / dental amalgams in people’s mouths in the 1830’s, 1840’s and 1850’s.

So by 1906, people had been breathing mercury vapor for 50 years of their life.

Boyd Haley, PhD has said many times that mercury causes Alzheimer’s.

Autism was first described by Leo Kanner in 1943.

They started putting mercury in vaccines and on seed corn in 1932-1933.

Alzheimer’s and autism did not exist before humans were exposed to mercury in this way.

People who reported a history of three (3) childhood infections or more were 40% less likely to have non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma compared with those that reported no infection according to a 2005 study.

People who reported a history of childhood measles were 66% less likely to have Hodgkin’s lymphoma compared with those that reported not having had childhood measles according to a 2005 study.

People who reported a history of childhood measles were 40% less likely to have non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma compared with those that reported not having had childhood measles according to a 2005 study.

People who reported a history of childhood chickenpox 47% less likely to have non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma compared with those that reported not having had childhood measles according to a 2005 study.

In this 23-second video clip, Peter Aaby, DMSc, founder of the Bandim Health Project in West Africa, notes that they found that a new measles vaccine that was recommended by the WHO in 1989 increased the death rate in female infants 2-fold.

He notes that, had it been implemented, the new measles vaccine would have caused an additional 500,000 female deaths in Africa.

Peter Aaby is credited for the discovery of non-specific effects of vaccines – i.e. effects of vaccines, which go beyond the specific protective effects against the targeted diseases.

Infants 3 to 5 months old were 5-times more likely to die if they had received both the Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis (DTP) vaccine and the Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) than infants of the same age who had not been vaccinated according to a 2017 study of an urban African community by Danish researchers.

Infants 3 to 5 months old were 10-times more likely to die if they had received only the Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis (DTP) vaccine, and not the Oral Polio Vaccine.

(In other words, giving the oral polio vaccine along with the DTP vaccine seemed to reduce the negative effects of the DTP vaccine.)

“All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis,” the authors of the study concluded.

In this 2.5-minute video clip Boyd Haley, PhD talks about how the US mandates the most vaccines for children in the world and also has the highest rate of autism in the world, and has a high mortality rate for children under 5 (34th on the list of countries for infant mortality).

If vaccines are supposed to save lives as the CDC claims, and if vaccines do not cause autism, as the CDC claims, then what is causing this?

In this three-minute video clip Boyd Haley, PhD talks about how as vaccines increased, autism increased.

In this one-minute video clip Boyd Haley, PhD talks about how the flu vaccine has not saved any lives.

In this 3-minute video clip Boyd Haley, PhD talks about measles outbreaks in vaccinated populations.

He shows six pie chart showing that:

In 1984, 58% of all school-aged children in the US who contracted measles were adequately vaccinated.

In 1985, there was a measles outbreak in Corpus Christie, Texas. The population was fully vaccinated (99%).

In 1986, there was a measles outbreak in Dane County, Wisconsin. 96% of the cases were in vaccinated people.

In 1988, 69% of all school-aged children in the US who contracted measles were adequately vaccinated.

In 1989, 89% of all school-aged children in the US are contracted measles were adequately vaccinated.

In 1995, 56% of all measles cases in the US occurred in people who were previously vaccinated.

In this 3-minute video clip Boyd Haley, PhD talks about how the USA has the highest infant vaccination rate in the world, and yet the USA is number 41 on the infant mortality list (which is bad).

He notes that the USA has a very high rate of aged individuals being vaccinated, yet we are number 28 on the longevity list as of 2011.

He notes that the USA has the highest vaccine rate as well as the highest level of autism of five major countries.

(Are vaccines causing this?)

He asks if vaccines are decreasing the rate of childhood death due to infectious diseases as the FDA and CDC claims, then what is causing all of the excess infant deaths in the US making it number 41 on the infant mortality list?

He also asks why are there roughly 19,000 more babies dying in the USA every year than if the USA had the same infant mortality rate as Singapore or Sweden?

(Are vaccines causing this?)

“I’m going to show you that there is damn little proof that [ vaccines ] work, if any,” Boyd Haley notes.

In this one-minute video clip Boyd Haley, PhD talks about how deaths from measles in England and Wales had declined by 99.4% from 1901/1902 to 1968 when the measles vaccine was introduced.

In this 2.5-minute video clip Boyd Haley, PhD shows a chart of how influenza deaths in children under 5 increased from about 15 per year in 2002 to about 90 per year in 2003, a 6-fold increase, after the by the US CDC mandated flu vaccine in early childhood in mid-2002.

In this 1.5-minute video clip Boyd Haley, PhD shows a chart included in an article from the Washington Post, Oct 25, 2005 in an article titled As Vaccination Rates Rise, Flu Deaths Little Changed that says,

    ”Despite a rapid rise in vaccination among the elderly between 1980 and 1998, the death rate from flu-related illness in this population has remained flat.”
    “One implication: The vaccine is not all that effective in lowering the risk of death.”

— A Shot of Fear: Flu Death Risk Often Exaggerated; So Is Benefit of Vaccine: As Vaccination Rates Rise, Flu Deaths Little Changed written by Lisa Schwartz, MD, Steve Woloshin, MD and H. Gilbert Welch, MD as a Special in the Washington Post, Oct 25, 2005, F4.
    They are the authors of the book Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health.

In this 1.5-minute video clip Boyd Haley, PhD gives evidence that infectious diseases such as typhoid and dysentery decreased dramatically even though their are no vaccines for these diseases.

The chart is similar for all infectious diseases; those with vaccines and those without.

He talks about how antibiotics, and not vaccines, are responsible for much of the decreases in deaths from infectious diseases.

In this two-minute video clip Boyd Haley, PhD gives data showing that polio cases increased 2-4-fold in five (5) places in the US where the polio vaccine was made compulsory by law.

He also shows that polio rates had already decreased dramatically in the Dominican Republic before the polio vaccine was instituted.

He refers to this as the polio myth.

In the attached one-minute video, Boyd Haley, PhD describes how the polio vaccine was not responsible for a decline in deaths from polio, but instead the decrease in deaths from polio (and other infectious diseases) occured because of good hygiene, good food and good housing and occurred before the polio vaccine was instituted.

About Boyd Haley, PhD

Boyd Haley, PhD has a PhD in both chemistry and biochemistry.

Boyd Haley, PhD is a former Chairman & Professor of the Department of Chemistry at the University of Kentucky.

Boyd Haley, PhD is a permanent member of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Biomedical Sciences, Study Section.

A recent vaccine study found that statins have an immunosuppressive effect.

Older people on statins given flu vaccines for various strains of flu had a 38-67% lower response to the vaccine than people not on statins.

“This apparent immunosuppressive effect of statins on the vaccine immune response was most dramatic in individuals receiving synthetic statins,” the paper notes.

LDL cholesterol inactivates bacteria and viruses; in other words, adequate amounts of LDL are a good thing, not a bad thing

Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD has noted that LDL cholesterol inactivates bacteria and viruses, however, he has also noted that this fact is not widely known.

Therefore, my guess would be that this is the reason that statins have an immunosuppressive effect, that is, statins lower LDL cholesterol which is involved in the immune response.

“Never has there been a safe vaccine. Never will there be a safe vaccine. It is not possible to have a safe vaccine,” notes Suzanne Humphries, MD, coauthor of the book Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History, in the attached video.

“If indeed [vaccines are] such a miraculous product, wouldn’t we be noticing how miraculous it is,” asks Suzanne Humphries, MD, coauthor of the book Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History, in the attached video.

“Are they saying that we are just too stupid to notice that [vaccines are] killing people and maiming people?

“That we’re too stupid to notice [vaccines are] miraculous?

“I think that is a lot of the argument, [that] we’re just too stupid to notice how miraculous this is, so to protect everybody, … they’re going to give it to us anyway.”

“Why must such a wonderful product [vaccines] be forced upon people since the beginning of vaccination,” asks Suzanne Humphries, MD, coauthor of the book Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History, in the attached video.

“If people were really seeing each other dropping dead of smallpox, and they were really seeing each other being saved by a smallpox vaccine, the line would be out of town… to get it.

“That’s never been the case.”

“The history books really show that the people that were vaccinated were among the sickest.,” notes Suzanne Humphries, MD, coauthor of the book Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History, in the attached video.

I used to believe that vaccines were safe.

I used to believe that vaccines were effective.

I used to believe that vaccines were responsible for the dramatic decrease in infectious diseases such as polio and smallpox.

I no longer believe any of this.

I now believe the exact opposite.

I also believe that autism is a man-made disease which largely has been the result of vaccines given to children.

Below is the evidence for why I believe this.

This is part 2 of 3 of the article about autism being a man-made disease.

This is part 3 of 3 of the article about autism being a man-made disease.

William Thompson, PhD, a CDC epidemiologist turned whistleblower, admitted to committing fraud in order to hide the fact that they had found a relationship between the timing of the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccine and an increased risk of autism in black boys.

Thompson’s statement starts off by saying,

“My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998.

“The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism.

“Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”

See his statement here.

A reanalysis of the CDC data which was done by Brian Hooker, PhD, who Thompson had confessed his fraud to, found that black males given the MMR vaccine before the age of 36 months (3 years) were 3.4 times more likely to get autism than those given the vaccine later.

“The results show a strong relationship between child age at the administration of the first MMR and autism incidence exclusively for African American boys which could indicate a role of the vaccine in the etiology of autism within this population group. This particular analysis was not completed in the original Destefano et al. (CDC) study,” Hooker’s paper notes.

“Influenza vaccines have a very modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost in the general population, including pregnant women,” concludes a review by the Cochrane Collaboration.

They note that “at least 40 people would need vaccination to avoid one [influenza-like illness] case… and 71 people would need vaccination to prevent one case of influenza. Vaccination shows no appreciable effect on working days lost or hospitalisation.”

They also note that “Over 200 viruses cause influenza and [influenza-like illness], producing the same symptoms (fever, headache, aches, pains, cough and runny noses). Without laboratory tests, doctors cannot distinguish between them as both last for days and rarely lead to death or serious illness. At best, vaccines may only be effective against influenza A and B, which represent about 10% of all circulating viruses.”

Their 2010 review on the same subject also noted that, “The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies.”

The 2010 review also noted that, “There is no evidence that they affect complications, such as pneumonia, or transmission [of the flu to other people].”