QUICKLINKS AND VIEW OPITONS

EMAIL THE ARTICLE BELOW TO A FRIEND

Email address of your friend:
(For example: myfriend@aol.com)

Your name:
(Example: Lori Jones)

Your email address:
(For example: lorijones@aol.com)

Subject:

Message:
Here is a summary of article I thought you might be interested in. Is the cure for schizophrenia worse than the disease asked the father of American psychopharmacology In an interview that Robert Whitaker did in Salon, he noted that, In the late 1970s, Jonathan Cole — the father of American psychopharmacology — wrote a paper called “Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease?” that signaled that antipsychotics weren’t the lifesaving drugs that people had hoped. In it, he reviewed all of the long-term harm the drugs could cause and observed that studies had shown that at least 50 percent of all schizophrenia patients could fare well without the drugs. He wrote, “Every schizophrenic outpatient maintained on antipsychotic medication should have the benefit of an adequate trial without drugs.” This would save many from the dangers of tardive dyskinesia — involuntary body movements — as well as the financial and social burdens of prolonged drug therapy. The title of the paper poignantly sums up the awful long-term paradox. Abram Hoffer, MD, PhD, who used large doses of niacin to treat schizophrenia, also wrote about this many years ago, noting that schizophrenics do better in countries where they don’t use drugs than in countries where they do use drugs. Here is the link to the entire article. http://www.fatnews.com/index.php/5974

Is the cure for schizophrenia worse than the disease asked the father of American psychopharmacology

In an interview that Robert Whitaker did in Salon, he noted that,

In the late 1970s, Jonathan Cole — the father of American psychopharmacology — wrote a paper called “Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease?” that signaled that antipsychotics weren’t the lifesaving drugs that people had hoped.

In it, he reviewed all of the long-term harm the drugs could cause and observed that studies had shown that at least 50 percent of all schizophrenia patients could fare well without the drugs.

He wrote, “Every schizophrenic outpatient maintained on antipsychotic medication should have the benefit of an adequate trial without drugs.”

This would save many from the dangers of tardive dyskinesia — involuntary body movements — as well as the financial and social burdens of prolonged drug therapy.

The title of the paper poignantly sums up the awful long-term paradox.

Abram Hoffer, MD, PhD, who used large doses of niacin to treat schizophrenia, also wrote about this many years ago, noting that schizophrenics do better in countries where they don’t use drugs than in countries where they do use drugs.

Posted by: Larry Hobbs on Jun 22, 2016 - 11:11 am

© Copyright 2003-2017 - Larry Hobbs - All Rights Reserved.

Discussion Forums
NEW!

Recent Forum Topics
NEW!

STORE

SEARCH THIS SITE

SEARCH THE WEB

CONTACT US

TABLES

MEMBERS

MAILING LIST

CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES

ARCHIVE SUMMARY

RSS / XML

WEATHER

QUICKLINKS AND VIEW OPITONS

EMAIL THE ARTICLE BELOW TO A FRIEND

Is the cure for schizophrenia worse than the disease asked the father of American psychopharmacology

Discussion ForumsNEW!

Recent Forum TopicsNEW!

STORE

SEARCH THIS SITE

SEARCH THE WEB

CONTACT US

TABLES

MEMBERS

MAILING LIST

CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES

ARCHIVE SUMMARY

RSS / XML

WEATHER

QUICKLINKS AND VIEW OPITONS

EMAIL THE ARTICLE BELOW TO A FRIEND

Is the cure for schizophrenia worse than the disease asked the father of American psychopharmacology

Discussion Forums
NEW!

Recent Forum Topics
NEW!